What Facility & User Groups Need to Know About Planning Active Learning Classrooms
Having designed many active and collaborative learning classrooms that support peer-to-peer concepts, we have learned more than a few lessons at LCM Architects. As we continue to collect post occupancy surveys and gain valuable feedback, we expect to learn even more. The first of this two part article will focus on the facility and user groups’ perspective.
The open space in the room is as important as the table space. For collaboration and use of perimeter whiteboards, students and faculty must be able to move freely. Space for people to pass each other, stand at a whiteboard and write, and look over each other’s shoulders is what this experience is about.
There is no perfect furniture solution. Flexibility and ease of reconfiguration are paramount to active learning classrooms but are often the very features at odds with connectivity and power supply. Disconnecting power or AV takes time, even if they are plug-in, which will affect available teaching time. Table shapes that work for collaboration do not reconfigure into neat and tidy rows as easily as suggested. It takes time and often more than one individual. The capacity in one configuration will not be the same in alternate configurations. Wireless may work in the future, but right now we still need the power supply.
The capacity will be less. Within a given space, the capacity of an active, collaborative environment will be less than with tablet arms. There is nothing as efficient for cramming students into a space as tablet arms. You can try square tables, round tables, hexagonal and octagonal tables, and they will all provide fewer seats than tablet arms. The only way to have the same or greater capacity is to have seats without tablet arms or tables. Just a fact.
Technology is moving so quickly that the device specified today may be obsolete prior to delivery. If possible, delay specification and purchase of AV and IT until the last possible moment. This will require flexibility within purchasing policies and flexibility in the design.
There will be faculty disagreement. These are emerging concepts which change years of practice. Not everyone is ready to make the leap. The design team can be supportive and understanding but cannot resolve that challenge for the facility and user representatives.
This post was written by Richard Lehner, AIA, LEEP AP